top of page

Force Majeure- No one size fits all

The decision of Bombay High Court in the case of Standard Retail Pvt. Limited & Ors. v. G.S. Global Corp & Ors.1 firmly establishes that force majeure is not a case of “one size fits all”, even when evaluated in context of a global pandemic such as Covid-19. The decision came in the context of Section 9 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed before the court seeking directions to restrain negotiating banks from negotiating / encashing the letters of credit. The petition was filed by buyers in India, who had contracted to purchase of steel products from the suppliers from South Korea. The goods had already been shipped from South Korea and the court observed that the supplier had already performed its obligations under the contract.

Force Majeure- No one size fits all- April 13 2020
Download PDF • 741KB

6 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

What is #EconomicOwnership and whether it is recognized under Indian Tax Regulations? #BEPS has put the focus back on the Legal vs Economic Ownership of an intangible asset. Simply put legal ownershi

Who is an agent and how to set an agent"s remuneration (Transfer Pricing Perspective)? Most business persons would know who is an agent in common parlance but is the same meaning also true for Tax/ T

What is Substance in Transfer Pricing Context? The new international tax regime under BEPS emphasizes on actual conduct over form requiring profit allocation between jurisdictions to mirror actual di

bottom of page