top of page
  • ADMIN

Force Majeure- No one size fits all

The decision of Bombay High Court in the case of Standard Retail Pvt. Limited & Ors. v. G.S. Global Corp & Ors.1 firmly establishes that force majeure is not a case of “one size fits all”, even when evaluated in context of a global pandemic such as Covid-19. The decision came in the context of Section 9 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed before the court seeking directions to restrain negotiating banks from negotiating / encashing the letters of credit. The petition was filed by buyers in India, who had contracted to purchase of steel products from the suppliers from South Korea. The goods had already been shipped from South Korea and the court observed that the supplier had already performed its obligations under the contract.


Force Majeure- No one size fits all- April 13 2020
.pdf
Download PDF • 741KB

8 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Transfer Pricing for CFOs/ Tax Heads (Learning Byte 06)

Whether NIL price can be an arm's length price? Normally one expects a quid pro quo in the form of market price or arms length price for any good sold or service rendered. However, there are exception

Transfer Pricing for CFOs/ Tax Heads (Learning Byte 05)

What's the'Hard' in 'Hard to Value Intangibles'? Intangibles by definition are unique and hard to benchmark. This begs the question why OECD has coined the phrase "Hard to Value Intangible' (HTVI) -

bottom of page